There are
223 Ann
Coulter replies, political, humor, nostalgia and tribute
columns |
|
Choose the column type BELOW |
 |
|
|
 |
Your
selections will appear BELOW |
 |
|
|
|
You've Chosen |
Category |
Ann Coulter Reply |
Published |
January, 2007 |
Synopsis |
Ann Coulter - Deconstructing history is easy. Ask Ann! |
Let’s all Deconstruct History
By Al Owens
Christopher Columbus never set foot in what is now known as the United States.
Not only that, he didn’t even get close to the mainland of North or South
America in 1492. Not only that, he was four hundred years late in laying claim
to discovering the New World. (He went to his grave thinking Cuba was part of
Asia, by the way). It seems it wasn’t until 1498 that Columbus landed in South
America. Yet there are people alive today who’d swear he walked along 42nd
Street in New York City.
But that’s what happens when you put any history under a microscope. You can
deconstruct it until it really doesn’t reflect anything recognizable to most of
us. Erik the Red, for the record, was the Viking credited with reaching the New
World first. He found Newfoundland in 982 A.D. – hundreds of years before
Columbus went looking for Sushi and returned to Europe with Enchiladas!
Even our National Anthem seems a bit odd when you take a close look at it. In
one way, it’s a tribute to plain old faulty bomb making. Keep in mind that in
1814 Francis Scott Key waited outside of Fort McHenry for a battle to end so he
could go inside on legal business. He saw those “bombs bursting in air”, as he
sat all night. In those days, the fuses were cut so that bombs would go off as
they hit their targets. Improperly cut fuses caused them to go off at the wrong
time – in midair. So that’s the origin of the line “bursting in air”. All of
that for a poem, that would later be added to an English funeral tune and called
The Star Spangled Banner. Personally, I like America the Beautiful a lot more.
It doesn’t have any bombs in it.
Let’s look at Jesus. Most of the artistic works that depict him show a Caucasian
with long flowing hair. (Sometimes they make him look like the perfect Aryan)
Yet the Bible and Biblical Scholars disagree. Some claim he would have a broad
face, short curly hair and dark skin. I’ve even read that he may have only been
5’1” tall and only weighed about 120 pounds. But all of that is a deconstruction
of what is commonly believed.
I’ve deconstructed all of this so show you how easy it can be to turn history
upside-down to make a point. Ann Coulter’s latest deconstruction does just that.
First, I really don’t understand why somebody would devote an entire column to
share their disapproval of a holiday – and President Bush’s acknowledgement of
it. She printed her first disapproving words about Kwanzaa six years ago. She
must have been so empty of holiday cheer this year, she’s dusted off her old
anti-Kwanzaa tirade and added some updated “facts” to give it the fresh feel of
a tongue lashing
For starters, she keeps referring to Kwanzaa as a made up holiday. Most holidays
are made up. Many of the people who celebrate July the Fourth have no idea why
we celebrate it. They just take the day off and shoot off fireworks. Somebody
must have said, “Hey! Let’s make the fourth day of July and annual holiday”. But
that’s ok.
She also claims, and wrongly, that the Symbionese Liberation Army (That group of
so-called revolutionaries that kidnapped Patty Hearst, until she became one of
them) is the “intellectual sibling” of Kwanzaa. To be honest, the SLA adopted
the Seven Principals of Kwanzaa – but so what? Those seven principals include:
Unity, Self-Determination, Collective Work and Responsibility, Cooperative
Economics, Purpose, Creativity, and Faith. Would Ann Coulter write a column
about Donald Duck if she found out the SLA had gone to a Disney movie?
All of this is rather silly. Kwanzaa was never designed as some counter
Christmas holiday. It’s supposed to be a year end celebration that brings about
the uplifting elements of being African American. No matter who devised the
holiday, no matter who celebrates it, or no matter who acknowledges it – Ann
Coulter’s attempts to deconstruct it can’t change that.
|
|
|
|
|
|